top of page

Is Tebra EHR the Right Choice for New Medical Practices? Pros and Cons

Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are essential tools for modern medical practices, streamlining patient management, billing, and clinical workflows. Tebra EHR, formerly known as Kareo Clinical, is a popular choice among independent healthcare providers. However, new practices must carefully evaluate whether Tebra EHR aligns with their specific needs and challenges.


Is Tebra EHR the Right Choice for New Medical Practices? Pros and Cons

Page Content:


 

Understanding Tebra EHR

Tebra EHR is a cloud-based platform designed to integrate various aspects of practice management, including electronic health records, patient intake, billing, and appointment scheduling, into a single unified system. It aims to enhance operational efficiency and patient care delivery through a user-friendly interface.

Tebra EHR Software Review (2024)


 

Potential Drawbacks of Tebra EHRs for New Practices (Cons)

While Tebra EHR offers a range of features, new medical practices should be aware of certain disadvantages:

  1. Learning Curve and Training Requirements: Implementing a new EHR system can be challenging, especially for practices transitioning from paper-based records or different software. Users have reported that, despite its design, Tebra EHR may require comprehensive training to utilize its features effectively.

    EMR Finder


  2. Customization Limitations: Some users have noted restrictions in customizing certain aspects of the platform, such as clinical templates and reporting tools. This limitation can hinder a practice's ability to tailor the system to its specific workflows and preferences.

    EMR Finder


  3. Customer Support Concerns: Effective customer support is crucial during the initial setup and ongoing use of an EHR system. There have been reports of inadequate customer service from Tebra, with delays in addressing technical issues, which could disrupt practice operations.

    Capterra


  4. Billing and Revenue Cycle Management Challenges: Efficient billing processes are vital for the financial health of a new practice. Some users have experienced issues with Tebra billing functionalities, including errors and integration problems, potentially leading to revenue cycle disruptions.

    Capterra


  5. System Downtime and Reliability: Reliability is a key factor in selecting an EHR system. Instances of system downtime have been reported, causing significant disruptions to practice operations and patient care.

    Capterra.


Doctor using computer Document Management System DMS online documentation database process automation to efficiently manage files

Potential Drawbacks for New Practices (Continued): Pricing Concerns

  1. Unclear Pricing Structure: One of the significant challenges for new practices considering Tebra EHR is its pricing model. While Tebra offers a variety of plans tailored to different practice needs, the exact costs are often not transparently outlined upfront. Many users report having to engage in lengthy discussions with sales representatives to understand the total pricing, which can lead to confusion and difficulty in budgeting.

  2. High Initial Costs for Implementation: For new practices, initial costs are a critical consideration. While Tebra advertises itself as a cost-effective solution for smaller practices, setup fees, training costs, and potential add-ons for advanced features can quickly add up. This can make the platform less accessible to startups operating on tight budgets.

  3. Subscription Fees for Additional Services: Tebra pricing often includes a basic subscription fee, but additional charges for features like patient engagement tools, advanced reporting, or integrated billing services can inflate costs. For a new practice, these incremental charges may not be feasible, especially when the practice is still building its patient base and revenue streams.

  4. Long-Term Contracts: Another concern frequently cited is the contractual terms associated with Tebra EHR. Some new practices have reported being locked into long-term contracts, which can be a financial burden if the system does not meet their expectations or needs.

  5. Hidden Costs of Customization and Support: While Tebra offers various customization options, some of these may incur additional fees. Moreover, if premium support is needed—particularly during the initial phases of implementation—new practices might face unexpected expenses that further strain their budgets.


Takeaway: Pricing concerns, including hidden costs, unclear structures, and potential add-ons, make Tebra EHR a challenging choice for new practices that require affordability and transparency during their formative years. Practices should ensure a full understanding of all costs involved before committing to the platform.


 

Tebra EHR Considerations for New Practices

When evaluating Tebra EHR, new practices should consider the following:

  • Assess Specific Needs: Determine whether Tebra features align with your practice's requirements, including specialty-specific functionalities and scalability.

  • Evaluate Support Services: Investigate the quality and responsiveness of Tebra customer support to ensure timely assistance when needed.

  • Analyze Cost Implications: Consider the pricing structure and whether it fits within your practice's budget, accounting for potential additional costs related to training or customization.

  • Seek User Feedback: Consult reviews and testimonials from other new practices that have implemented Tebra EHR to gain insights into their experiences.


 

Conclusion

While Tebra EHR offers a suite of tools designed for independent medical practices, new practices should carefully evaluate its potential drawbacks, including learning curves, customization limitations, customer support concerns, billing challenges, and system reliability issues. Conducting a thorough assessment will help determine whether Tebra EHR is the right fit for your practice's unique needs.

Comments

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.